Decent Billing
Back to All Guides

Decent Billing Guide

Decent Billing Guide to Choosing One App or a Billing Software Stack

How to decide whether your firm should use one integrated billing workflow or piece together best-of-breed tools.

By Decent Billing Staff

There are two sane ways to run billing software at a small architecture or design firm. You can use one integrated workflow, or you can piece together a stack of tools that are each good at one part of the process.

Either approach can work. The question is whether the handoffs are controlled. Billing breaks when timekeeping, invoice preparation, client review, sending, payment status, and accounting all live in different places with no clear owner.

Three common billing stacks

Best-of-breed stack

Works when each handoff is intentional.

  1. Harvest timekeeping
  2. Decent Billing review
  3. Harvest or client invoice
  4. QuickBooks accounting

Harvest-centered stack

Good when billing rules are simple.

  1. Harvest timekeeping
  2. Harvest invoice
  3. QuickBooks or Xero accounting

Decent Billing workflow

Recommended when you want billing handled in one place.

  1. Timekeeping
  2. Billing rules
  3. Invoice review
  4. Ready-to-send invoice
  5. QuickBooks accounting

How to decide

  1. Use a stack if every tool has a clear job

    A stack can be perfectly reasonable. The trouble starts when time is in one place, approvals are in another, credits live in a spreadsheet, and nobody knows which system owns the final invoice.

  2. Use one billing workflow if handoffs are costing you time

    If the same person keeps moving data between systems every month, the firm is paying for invisible admin work. That is usually the signal to simplify.

  3. Keep accounting separate when it should be separate

    QuickBooks can still be the accounting system of record. The goal is not to replace accounting. The goal is to make the invoice correct before it reaches accounting.

The stack approach can be fine

A best-of-breed stack can be a good setup. For example, your firm might track time in Harvest, prepare and review the billing logic in Decent Billing, send the invoice through Harvest or another client-facing invoice tool, and then sync the final accounting record to QuickBooks.

That can work if everyone understands the sequence. Harvest owns time. Decent Billing owns invoice preparation and review. The sending tool owns the client-facing invoice. QuickBooks owns the books. The danger is when the same data is manually edited in three places and no one knows which version is final.

The integrated approach is calmer

The nicer version is to keep the billing workflow in one place: timekeeping, billing rules, progress billing, credits, retainers, expenses, review, and the ready-to-send invoice all in the same flow. Then QuickBooks receives the final accounting handoff.

This is the Decent Billing recommendation. Use best-of-breed tools where they genuinely help, but do not make your firm manage a fragile chain of exports, imports, spreadsheet edits, and duplicate invoice records just because each tool technically has a feature.

What matters most

The right setup should make it obvious where time enters, where the invoice is prepared, where the final version is approved, and where accounting takes over. If your current stack cannot answer those questions, the stack is too loose.

If you want it taken care of, use Decent Billing as the single billing workflow and keep QuickBooks as the accounting destination. That gives your firm one place to prepare the bill, one version of the invoice to review, and one clean handoff when the invoice is ready.